Adam-God Theory
From Mormon Terms
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: ===Noun=== '''Adam-God Theory''' #The claim that Brigham Young taught that "Adam is our God," or that Heavenly Father came to earth as Adam. <!--#*Quotations--> ====Usage notes==== ====Syn...) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
'''Adam-God Theory''' | '''Adam-God Theory''' | ||
* Portuguese: {{t+|pt|Teoria Adão-Deus|f}} | * Portuguese: {{t+|pt|Teoria Adão-Deus|f}} | ||
− | * Spanish: {{t+|es|Teoría | + | * Spanish: {{t+|es|Teoría Adán-Dios|f}} |
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
====External links==== | ====External links==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Other Definitions=== | ||
+ | * (AM) ''[http://christiandefense.org/mor_define.htm The Language Barrier]'' -- Second President of the Church, Brigham Young taught that Adam was God the Father, "the only God with whom we have to do." This doctrine was taught and preached by Young, for over twenty years. In 1852 Young stated: | ||
+ | :::When our Father Adam came into the Garden of Eden, he came into it with a celestial body, and brought Eve, one of his wives, with him. He helped to make and organize this world. He is MICHAEL the Arch-angel, the ANCIENT of DAYS!. . . . He is our FATHER and our GOD and the only God with whom we have to do (Journal of Discourses, 1:50, 1852; emphasis theirs) | ||
+ | :Young was always consistent with this teaching. Twenty-one years after his statements in Journal of Discourses, in an article in the Deseret News, he confirmed this teaching to his Mormon devotes: | ||
+ | :::How much unbelief exists in the minds of the Latter-day Saints in regard to one particular doctrine which I revealed to them, and which God revealed unto me- namely that Adam is our Father and our God. . . . (Deseret News, June 18, 1873). | ||
+ | :If anyone wishes to assert that this teaching was not official but rather the mere speculation of LDS Prophet, Brigham Young, notice this statement where Young refutes that idea: | ||
+ | :::I have never yet preached a sermon [as in Journal of Discourses] and sent it out to the children of men that they may not call Scripture. . . . (Journal of Discourses, 13:95; emphasis added). | ||
+ | |||
+ | |
Latest revision as of 15:19, 1 November 2012
Contents |
[edit] Noun
Adam-God Theory
- The claim that Brigham Young taught that "Adam is our God," or that Heavenly Father came to earth as Adam.
[edit] Usage notes
[edit] Synonyms
[edit] Derived terms
[edit] Related terms
[edit] Translations
Adam-God Theory
- Portuguese: Teoria Adão-Deus pt(pt) f.
- Spanish: Teoría Adán-Dios es(es) f.
[edit] References
[edit] External links
[edit] Other Definitions
- (AM) The Language Barrier -- Second President of the Church, Brigham Young taught that Adam was God the Father, "the only God with whom we have to do." This doctrine was taught and preached by Young, for over twenty years. In 1852 Young stated:
- When our Father Adam came into the Garden of Eden, he came into it with a celestial body, and brought Eve, one of his wives, with him. He helped to make and organize this world. He is MICHAEL the Arch-angel, the ANCIENT of DAYS!. . . . He is our FATHER and our GOD and the only God with whom we have to do (Journal of Discourses, 1:50, 1852; emphasis theirs)
- Young was always consistent with this teaching. Twenty-one years after his statements in Journal of Discourses, in an article in the Deseret News, he confirmed this teaching to his Mormon devotes:
- How much unbelief exists in the minds of the Latter-day Saints in regard to one particular doctrine which I revealed to them, and which God revealed unto me- namely that Adam is our Father and our God. . . . (Deseret News, June 18, 1873).
- If anyone wishes to assert that this teaching was not official but rather the mere speculation of LDS Prophet, Brigham Young, notice this statement where Young refutes that idea:
- I have never yet preached a sermon [as in Journal of Discourses] and sent it out to the children of men that they may not call Scripture. . . . (Journal of Discourses, 13:95; emphasis added).